Along with plan and elevation, section is one of the essential representational techniques of architectural design; among architects and educators, debates about a project's section are common and often intense. Until now, however, there has been no framework to describe or evaluate it. Manual of Section fills this void.
Paul Lewis, Marc Tsurumaki, and David J. Lewis have developed seven categories of section, revealed in structures ranging from simple one-story buildings to complex structures featuring stacked forms, fantastical shapes, internal holes, inclines, sheared planes, nested forms, or combinations thereof. To illustrate these categories, the authors construct sixty-three intricately detailed cross-section perspective drawings of built projects—many of the most significant structures in international architecture from the last one hundred years—based on extensive archival research. Manual of Section also includes smart and accessible essays on the history and uses of section.
##略。
评分##看到后面觉得前面的分类好扯且并不能指导设计…它是对结果进行分析而不是研究生成的出发点…比如incline是从流线出发(古根海姆)还是塑形;不过作为操作手法的reference 图赞一下…
评分##看得很爽
评分##清晰易懂且实用,但有它的局限性。分类方式显得略略简单粗暴,可以帮助初学者。但毕竟只是建筑的一个切片。另,看了以后觉得,过了一百年,现代建筑的内部空间并没有什么划时代的进步。
评分##略。
评分##图还是不错的,但此书基于建筑剖面类型回推了建筑的生成手法,这非常容易误导人。这种简单粗暴的分类方法,在越当代的建筑中越缺乏说服力,因为它们的生成逻辑完全是另外一套语言。剖面,不管是作为表达还是作为设计工具,在应对当代建筑的复杂性时的软弱无力暴露无遗。
评分##看了电子版 是不是少图啊...图文对应不上还是故意让我自己一个个查.....阅读体验有点差 但内容还是不错的
评分##提问Paul 可不可以从剖面着手设计,paul说可以不过你要3d建模。题外话,美国人太容易执着于一件事,拿出来反复研究说,二维section 的复杂程度,figure ground 的抽象关系,对此西扎,卒姆托等的建筑体验可以啪啪打脸。
评分##实习生到最后也是没有在在意怎么放人。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.idnshop.cc All Rights Reserved. 静思书屋 版权所有