具體描述
On the eve of International Women’s Day in 2015, the Chinese government arrested five feminist activists and jailed them for thirty-seven days. The Feminist Five became a global cause célèbre, with Hillary Clinton speaking out on their behalf and activists inundating social media with #FreetheFive messages. But the Five are only symbols of a much larger feminist movement of civil rights lawyers, labor activists, performance artists, and online warriors prompting an unprecedented awakening among China’s educated, urban women. In Betraying Big Brother, journalist and scholar Leta Hong Fincher argues that the popular, broad-based movement poses the greatest challenge to China’s authoritarian regime today.
Through interviews with the Feminist Five and other leading Chinese activists, Hong Fincher illuminates both the difficulties they face and their “joy of betraying Big Brother,” as one of the Feminist Five wrote of the defiance she felt during her detention. Tracing the rise of a new feminist consciousness now finding expression through the #MeToo movement, and describing how the Communist regime has suppressed the history of its own feminist struggles, Betraying Big Brother is a story of how the movement against patriarchy could reconfigure China and the world.
用戶評價
##某些單方麵決定以評價學術專著的標準來雞蛋裏挑骨頭的用戶，實際上是無事找茬，暴露瞭基於立場和偏見而非基於事實和公正的馬腳
評分##某些單方麵決定以評價學術專著的標準來雞蛋裏挑骨頭的用戶，實際上是無事找茬，暴露瞭基於立場和偏見而非基於事實和公正的馬腳
評分##非常失望
評分##評論說得對，確實是在很主觀（很外賓）地講故事完全不學術，並沒有看到想要看到的深刻分析……（倒是突然意識到這個話題確實很敏感處境確實很嚴峻……
評分##洪理達真的literally打破瞭我對斯坦福的學術訓練能力的幻想，兩本書兩個極端，但是一緻的爛。leftover那本書不加論證地發錶瞭一堆駭人聽聞的言論，這本書1-7章全紀實講故事，沒有一丁點理論建構或是分析，講的還基本是翻微信公眾號都差不多能知道的故事，narrative也不咋地。我看斯坦福不行。
評分##2.5/5 Fincher would benefit if she bothered to hire a few editors for advice, because her writing appears tediously dry and repetitive, often without delving deeper into the 'history side' of the issue, not to mention that the feminism discussed in this book seems somewhat naive and strategically flawed in excluding men from the conversation.
評分##2.5/5 Fincher would benefit if she bothered to hire a few editors for advice, because her writing appears tediously dry and repetitive, often without delving deeper into the 'history side' of the issue, not to mention that the feminism discussed in this book seems somewhat naive and strategically flawed in excluding men from the conversation.
評分##打低分的公刃快爬
評分##某些單方麵決定以評價學術專著的標準來雞蛋裏挑骨頭的用戶，實際上是無事找茬，暴露瞭基於立場和偏見而非基於事實和公正的馬腳
相關圖書
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.tinynews.org All Rights Reserved. 静思书屋 版权所有