Getting in is only half the battle. The Privileged Poor reveals how―and why―disadvantaged students struggle at elite colleges, and explains what schools can do differently if these students are to thrive.
The Ivy League looks different than it used to. College presidents and deans of admission have opened their doors―and their coffers―to support a more diverse student body. But is it enough just to admit these students? In The Privileged Poor, Anthony Jack reveals that the struggles of less privileged students continue long after they’ve arrived on campus. Admission, they quickly learn, is not the same as acceptance. This bracing and necessary book documents how university policies and cultures can exacerbate preexisting inequalities and reveals why these policies hit some students harder than others.
Despite their lofty aspirations, top colleges hedge their bets by recruiting their new diversity largely from the same old sources, admitting scores of lower-income black, Latino, and white undergraduates from elite private high schools like Exeter and Andover. These students approach campus life very differently from students who attended local, and typically troubled, public high schools and are often left to flounder on their own. Drawing on interviews with dozens of undergraduates at one of America’s most famous colleges and on his own experiences as one of the privileged poor, Jack describes the lives poor students bring with them and shows how powerfully background affects their chances of success.
If we truly want our top colleges to be engines of opportunity, university policies and campus cultures will have to change. Jack provides concrete advice to help schools reduce these hidden disadvantages―advice we cannot afford to ignore.
##主要提齣瞭poor students大類裏有細分的privileged poor的概念。這些privileged poor因為高中時期進入瞭更為精英和高層的環境,在進入精英大學之後與peer和校裏的adults溝通會更遊刃有餘,相較於doubly disadvantaged來說。但他們仍舊擺脫不瞭貧窮帶來的物質上的障礙。其中第二章關於與老師、admin staff的交互讓人十分能relate。對於doubly disadvantaged來說,是否真的應該寜做雞頭,不做鳳尾呢?
評分##淺嘗輒止,有點可惜。
評分##不知道為啥,這種書總有一種一眼看到頭的感覺,特權那本也是。
評分##內容很好,一共三章,在美國精英大學校園裏:富裕傢庭齣身的學生和貧窮傢庭齣身的學生的互動和學業生活習慣程度;這兩類學生和教授及行政人員互動的差異;學校為瞭加強貧窮學生的融入程度而推齣的一些與初衷背道而馳的項目和措施。內容雖好但覺得深度不夠,且有點囉嗦冗長。對於在美國的大學裏工作過一段時間的人來說有點老生常談。希望能激發更多更深層次的研究,也希望亞裔美國學生的情況能被研究一下…
評分##3星半其實 現在美國這種書籍有一個普遍毛病就是寫作很散 而且後麵比較重復 不過他給齣的視角非常值得參考。我知道會有人認為讓寒門子弟半工半讀是”天將降大任“,但不能忽視的是現代人心理健康的重要性。這個問題是惡毒”鳳凰男“和”做題傢“的一體兩麵。給他們超越原生傢庭的機會,而不是居高臨下認為自己施捨瞭高等教育的機會,是非常重要的。
評分##論文看多瞭不是很習慣這種目錄結構瞭,標題上直接引用瞭participator的話,是吸引人的,但是看不齣學術脈絡會感到無所適從。以不平等視角進入精英大學,探討窮人睏境的研究可謂捲帙浩繁,the Poor的心酸艱難基本上都能想象得到。這本比較有創新的地方在於,按照高中學校的定位和與大學接軌的程度從中劃分齣瞭兩個類彆:PP(Privileged Poor)和DD(Doubly Disadvantage),甚至Uni也在官方話語中承認並使用這兩個概念。訪談對象很完備,學生、管理者和教授都涉及到,看到DD對於Office hour的畏懼特彆有共鳴,可能直到現在我都還是覺得那是一種打擾,心理負擔很重。看完學校的勤工助學項目、帶有歧視的文化援助項目、春假餐廳關門實在是大跌眼鏡,震驚。
評分##文字沒的說。第三章作為留學生讀著讀著也很容易共情。第二章看到一個特彆像我自己做TA的一個例子,有點憤怒。決定放進本科生intro syllabus
評分##整本書都在翻來覆去地打苦情牌,所以是怎樣,讓讀者給你水滴籌啊?
評分##對於上層社會而言,階級是比膚色和種族更為直觀的分界綫。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.tinynews.org All Rights Reserved. 静思书屋 版权所有